Legal Opinion

Hylton Flour Mills, Inc. v. Bowen

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1933No. Docket No. 632PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover from defendant damages for the alleged breach of a written contract. Defendant interposed a demurrer, both general and special, to plaintiff's complaint. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was rendered in defendant’s favor. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. It is conceded that the single question presented for consideration upon this appeal is the sufficiency of the complaint to withstand the attack presented by defendant’s general demurrer.

Two grounds were urged before the trial court in support of the demurrer to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mebius & Drescher Co. v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Los Angeles Olive Growers Ass'n v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Willhelm Lubrication Co. v. BrattrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. United States v. SchuermannDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948
  4. Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API