Legal Opinion

Mebius & Drescher Co. v. Mills

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1907No. S.F. No. 3842PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. F. Williamson, Wm. E. Kleinsorg, and Albert M. Johnson, for Appellant. Walter M. Willett, Louis Titus, H. M. Wright, and Franklin P. Bull, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants individually and as copartners doing business under the name of The Russell and Mount Eden Salt 'Company, for damages for breach of contract for failure to deliver salt in accordance with the demand of plaintiff, under the terms of a written contract between the parties. Trial was had before a jury. The preliminary proofs were made and the contract offered. in evidence. The court refused its admission upon the ground of its incompleteness and uncertainty, treating the writing as an executed contract of sale. Plaintiff contended that the contract should be construed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. National Furnace Co. v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wells v. . AlexandreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schofield v. Zion's Co-Op. Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. McIllmoil v. Frawley Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. O. A. Olin Co. v. LambachIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API