Legal Opinion
Willhelm Lubrication Co. v. Brattrud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1936No. 30,753PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Devanen, Chief Justice.
Action for damages for breach of contract for failure to accept delivery of 11,500 gallons of lubricating oil and 4,000 pounds of transmission grease.
On January 24, 1934, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement which reads as follows:
“The above seller hereby sells and agrees to hold in its storage for the Purchaser, and the above Purchaser hereby buys, the merchandise described below, which shall be shipped to Purchaser at Waseca, Minn, on Aug. 1st, 1934, unless ordered out sooner.
“Quantity Description Pee Gal. Total
“5000 gal. Worthmore Motor Oil SAE 10-70…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Alger-Fowler Co. v. TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Price v. AtkinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Wheeling Steel & Iron Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Vitex Manufacturing Corporation, Ltd. v. Caribtex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Gordon v. PfabSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Ellingsworth v. ShannonOregon Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.