Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Olive Growers Ass'n v. Pacific Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1914No. Civ. No. 1401PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages upon a surety bond conditioned for the faithful performance of a contract .made by plaintiff with one Rukichi Tajiri whereby the latter, for the consideration therein specified, agreed to furnish plaintiff with capable Japanese labor in the picking and harvesting of plaintiff’s olive crop.
Defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment of dismissal followed, from which plaintiff appeals.
The contract and bond are both set out in haec verba in the complaint, from which it appears that on October 10, 1910, Tajiri…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Blasingame v. Home Ins. Co. of City of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Barr v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- McInerney v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.