Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1994No. 60222-1PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This is an appeal from a superior court decision invalidating a conditional use permit for a sanitary landfill project in Pierce County. The trial court held that the hearing examiner denied Respondents Weyer*29haeusers the right to confront and examine county staff members in violation of Pierce County Code 2.36.090 and due process, and that the hearing examiner’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decision are inadequate as a matter of law. We agree that the ordinance requires cross examination of the county staff, and that the findings, conclusions, and decision are inadequate. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Barrie v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Klickitat County Citizens Against Imported Waste v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API