Legal Opinion
Dupuy v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1975No. L.A. 30381PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCOMB, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to rule on the merits of his request for a preliminaiy injunction against the Franchise Tax Board (hereinafter referred to as “the board"), one of the real parties in interest.
Facts: On or about December 11, 1973, the board sent petitioner a notice informing him that he owed for the taxable year 1972 additional income taxes (including interest) of $40,569.27. The board’s claim was based on its determination that petitioner’s income exceeded by $390,000 the amount he had declared on his income tax return. At the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Adams v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In Re Jack B. King Paula H. King, Debtors. Jack B. King Paula H. King v. Franchise Tax Board of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Western Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.