Legal Opinion

Adams v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1974No. Sac. 7959PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.—

Background

Petitioners challenge the constitutionality of California’s garageman’s labor and materials lien provided for by Civil Code sections 3068, subdivision (a), 1 3071, 2 3072, 3 3073, 4 5and 3074. 5 These provisions, in conjunc tion with section 5909, subdivision (a), of the Vehicle Code, 6 authorize an unpaid garageman to retain and sell vehicles to which he has made repairs and require the California Department of Motor Vehicles (department), upon proof of. the lien sale and notice to the owner, to transfer registration, of the car to a purchaser without prior hearing.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Richard Stypmann v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Crawford v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Van Atta v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API