Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Feige

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 29, 2006No. Nos. SC03-151, SC03-1006, SC03-1558, SC04-449, SC05-205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s recommendations in five disciplinary cases regarding alleged ethical breaches by respondent Hans Charles Feige. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

In each of the five cases, the referee found Feige guilty of numerous violations of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Rules) and recommended a one-year suspension. We approve the referee’s factual findings with regard to guilt on all rule violations. However, we do not approve the referee’s recommended discipline because we find that a one-year suspension is too lenient. Instead, we impose a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. SweeneySupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. The Florida Bar v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. The Florida Bar v. WohlSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. The Florida Bar v. KleinSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. The Florida Bar v. SpringerSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Florida Bar v. Byron Gregory PetersenSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API