Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Wohl
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 20, 2003No. SC95770PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
842 So.2d 811 (2003)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Edward H. WOHL, Respondent.
No. SC95770.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 20, 2003.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, John Anthony Boggs, Division Director and Edward Iturralde, Bar Counsel, Tallahassee, FL, for Complainant.
John A. Weiss of Weiss & Etkin, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review a referee's report regarding an alleged ethical breach by Edward H. Wohl. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Florida Bar filed a complaint alleging that Wohl violated rule 4-3.4(b) of the Rules Regulating the Florida…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. SpannSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- The Florida Bar v. SweeneySupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- The Florida Bar v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- In Re HensonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- The Florida Bar v. PapeSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- The Florida Bar v. MauriceSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Florida Bar v. SentonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.