Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We granted leave to appeal to decide whether the trial court erred in its determination that the plaintiff, in this malicious prosecution action, sustained the burden of presenting a jury submissible issue of fact regarding probable cause for criminal prosecution. We hold that plaintiff failed to meet that burden and that the trial court’s conclusion to the contrary was error.
In Michigan, prosecution is initiated in the sole discretion of the prosecutor. There was no evidentiary basis for the claim that the prosecution was initiated or maintained by defendant’s agents. An independent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kalina v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Sykes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Randy Alman v. Kevin ReedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.