Legal Opinion

Keller v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 1991No. CA A63278Published

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Petitioners, public officials of the City of Klamath Falls, seek review of the Commission’s order on remand from this court, 94 Or App 462, imposing on each of them a $1,132.50 penalty for their spouses’ receipt of food, lodging and travel from a New York investment banking firm, Dillon, Read & Co. ORS 244.040(2).1 The stipulated facts are set out in our original opinion and will not be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that Dillon, Read paid the expenses of petitioners and their spouses and also those of Wendt and Mr. & Mrs. Derrah, who were not public officials, although the two men…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Keller v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API