Legal Opinion

In Re Professionals Direct Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2009No. 08-4440PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

Professionals Direct Insurance Company petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus to vacate a discovery order issued by the district court. Professionals Direct contends that the order erroneously compels it to produce documents protected by the federal work-product doctrine and by Ohio’s attorney-client privilege. Because we find that Professionals Direct has not met the heavy burden required to justify a writ of mandamus, we DENY its petition.

I

Professionals Direct is the malpractice insurer for Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. United States v. Deloitte LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. Gruenbaum v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Towne Place Condo. Ass'n v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API