Legal Opinion

People v. Flaar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 2006No. 1-05-1497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, Robert Flaar, appeals from the denial of his motion to dismiss his charges in Cook County for dissemination of child pornography. He contends on appeal that his guilty plea for possession of child pornography in Kendall County precludes his current prosecution in Cook County for dissemination of child pornography pursuant to double jeopardy and compulsory joinder principles. Based on our conclusion that the image contained on defendant’s computer and later downloaded on a computer in Cook County stemmed from two separate criminal acts constituting two separate offenses, we affirm.

FA…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. GoodenIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. MultalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. SienkiewiczIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HunterIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. FarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. People v. DunnavanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. People v. DunnavanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. DunnavanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API