Legal Opinion

People v. Sienkiewicz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2003No. 93970PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

Defendant, who was indicted for reckless homicide (720 ILCS 5/9 — 3 (West 2000)), moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that it arose from the same facts that were the basis for a previous conviction for reckless driving (625 ILCS 5/11 — 503 (West 2000)). The trial court denied the motion to dismiss, finding that the charges for each offense arose from separate and distinct acts committed by defendant. On appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(f) (145 Ill. 2d R. 604(f)), the appellate court reversed, holding that double jeopardy precluded the State from prosecuting the reckless homicide…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. DinelliIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. HunterIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. Rodney J. Miles a/k/a Jamal D. Allen (077035) (Camden County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  5. People v. BlanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API