Legal Opinion

People v. Dunnavan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 2008No. 2-06-0518PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, David D. Dunnavan, appeals his conviction of child pornography (720 ILCS 5/11 — 20.1(a)(l)(iv) (West 2002)), contending that it is barred by the principle of double jeopardy. Defendant argues that his prior conviction in New Mexico of sexual exploitation of children (possession of child pornography) (N.M. Stat. Ann. §30 — 6A— 3(A) (LexisNexis 2007)) constitutes the same conduct and is also a lesser-included offense of the Illinois offense of creation of child pornography (720 ILCS 5/11 — 20.1(a)(l)(iv) (West 2002)), and that this serves to bar his conviction of the Illinois offense…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. PlacekIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. DinelliIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. GillespieAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. JimenezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. People v. JimenezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API