Legal Opinion

Kristanik v. Chevrolet Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 20, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtwood, J.

— This appeal has been heard both in division and in banc. Appellant’s statement is as follows:

‘'This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court sustaining the employer’s motion to quash an execution on a judgment in favor of the employee in a case arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

“The Workmen’s Compensation Commission heard the evidence on his claim for compensation and made an award against the employee and in favor of the employer, and a finding ‘that injury resulted in a loss of hand was not the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.’
“On…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Kemper v. GluckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. McGrew v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HendrixSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Howlett v. State Social Security CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. La Presto v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Meilves v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Knapp v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API