Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 16, 1993PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge.

The appellant, James Richard Jackson, presents a direct appeal from the Davidson County Criminal Court pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. The trial court found the appellant guilty of aggravated rape and aggravated sexual battery. He subsequently filed a motion for new trial and judgment of acquittal. After a hearing on the motion, the court granted the appellant’s judgment of acquittal as to the aggravated sexual battery charge. The court sentenced the appellant to twenty years as a Range I, standard offender.

The appellant contends…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. KillebrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. State v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BartramTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BlyeTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey K. ShawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. James Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API