State v. Mitchell
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this criminal action for the sole purpose of determining whether a criminal defendant is entitled to counsel, under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution of Tennessee, at a post-arrest lineup. We respond in the affirmative.
I
Defendant was convicted in the Criminal Court at Chattanooga on four charges of armed robbery and one charge of assault with intent to commit armed robbery. All sentences, except one, were made to run consecutively. We find that the award of consecutive…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TeelTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BushTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.