Legal Opinion

State v. Bartram

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

We granted this appeal to re-exámine this Court’s adoption of the so-called “angry wife” exception to the rule that a warrantless search and seizure is presumed unreasonable unless there is a valid consent to the search. Fifty years ago, in Kelley v. State 1 this Court viewed the marital relationship as an agency relationship between the husband and wife and, therefore, reasoned that the consent of the wife would bind the husband unless the consenting wife’s actions were hostile and adverse to her husband’s interest.

The trial court, relying on the Kelley precedent,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. PritchettTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. State v. YearganTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BridgesTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. DayTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API