Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 1991No. 90-AB-847; CA A65306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant had been convicted of a crime and placed on probation. He was discharged by employer after his probation was revoked and he was incarcerated for violating the condition of probation that he abstain from consuming alcoholic beverages. Claimant had a history of poor work attendance, and he had been warned by employer before his incarceration that his job was in jeopardy. Two weeks after claimant was incarcerated, employer reviewed his attendance records and fired him because of poor attendance. The incarceration was originally set to last for six months, but claimant served four months.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Giese v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Geraths v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Balduyck v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Dawson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API