City of Hialeah v. Bennett
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Affirmed on the authority of the rule stated as follows in Cahn v. Town of Huntington, 29 N.Y.2d 451, 328 N.Y.S.2d 672, 676, 278 N.E.2d 908, 910 (1972):
[A] municipal board or officer possesses implied authority to employ counsel in the good faith prosecution or defense of an action undertaken in the public interest, and in conjunction with its or his official duties where the municipal attorney refused to act, or was incapable of, or was disqualified from, acting.
Accord, Waigand v. City of Nampa, 64 Idaho 432, 133 P.2d 738 (1943); Braslow v. Barnett, 74 Misc.2d 26, 343 N.Y.S.2d 819…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- City of North Miami Beach v. EstesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Estes v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Krahmer v. McClaffertySuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
- Braslow v. BarnettSuffolk County District Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lomelo v. City of SunriseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Nordhagen v. OliverosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Pearl v. LomeloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982