Legal Opinion

Thuner v. Kanter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated m the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover a commission on a sale of real estate. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff brings error, alleging that the circuit judge committed error — First, in excluding testimony of plaintiff as to how much money he had expended in advertising the property; second, in admitting testimony of defendant that he had placed the property in the hands of other brokers; third, in directing a verdict for the defendant.

1. It was not error to exclude testimony as to expenditures made by plaintiff in advertising. Neither the pleadings, nor the plaintiff’s…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Antisdel v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ball v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Douville v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. King v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API