Thuner v. Kanter
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated m the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover a commission on a sale of real estate. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff brings error, alleging that the circuit judge committed error — First, in excluding testimony of plaintiff as to how much money he had expended in advertising the property; second, in admitting testimony of defendant that he had placed the property in the hands of other brokers; third, in directing a verdict for the defendant.
1. It was not error to exclude testimony as to expenditures made by plaintiff in advertising. Neither the pleadings, nor the plaintiff’s…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Antisdel v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Ball v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Douville v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- King v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.