Legal Opinion

Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

On the trial of an action, the competency, admissibility, and sufficiency of the evidence are for the court while the credibility of the witnesses, and the probative force and weight of the testimony are for the jury. Coach Co. v. Lee, 218 N.C. 320, 11 S.E. 2d 341.

A motion for a compulsory nonsuit under the statute now codified as G.S. 1-183 challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. Ballard v. Ballard, 230 N.C. 629, 55 S.E. 2d 316; Lea v. Bridgeman, 228 N.C. 565, 46 S.E. 2d 555; Ward v. Smith, 223 N.C. 141, 25 S.E.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Clare v. Bond County Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Little v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1968
  5. Auriemme v. Bridgeport Gas Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API