Auriemme v. Bridgeport Gas Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiffs sue for injuries they received when overcome by gas fumes which escaped from a kitchen stove. The first two counts are based on negligence upon the part of the defendant gas company. The third and fourth allege: “The furnishing and supply of gas to the home of the plaintiffs by the defendant constituted the use by the defendant of an intrinsically dangerous means to accomplish a lawful end, in such a way as necessarily or obviously exposed the plaintiff to the danger of probable injury.”
The defendant demurs to the third and fourth counts because they charge liability without…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Worth v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Heh v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Bellefuil v. WILLMAR GAS CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fickes v. Petrolane-Alaska Gas Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Dudley v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Daum v. Stamford Propane, No. X05 Cv 94-0139456 S (Sep. 29, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- McGinnis v. Gallagher Electric, No. X06-Cv-01-171020s (Dec. 2, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002