Legal Opinion

Engebritsen v. Latin-American Publishing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1918No. Civ. No. 1809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Prior to September, 1913, plaintiff copartnership contracted with defendant copartnership to print and bind a certain lot" of text-books for defendant. When the work was completed defendant copartnership was unable to pay the full amount due to the plaintiff on the contract, and a supplemental agreement was thereupon entered into where-under the defendant executed to the plaintiff its promissory note in the sum of three hundred dollars, and it was agreed between the parties that three thousand copies of the book then ready for delivery should be held by the plaintiff as security for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Mohr v. North Rawhide Mining & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hardy v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API