Freman v. Marshall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. O. L. Everts, District Attorney, and E. D. Edwards, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appeal from the judgment awarding a writ of mandate against the defendant as county treasurer of Fresno County. There being no bill of exceptions nor statement of the evidence, the findings are conclusively presumed to be true for the purposes of this appeal.
From them it appears that on the first day of July, 1898, the district attorney of Fresno County appointed plaintiff deputy district attorney of said county, and thereafter he took the proper oath, entered upon the discharge of the duties of said office, and continued to be such deputy district attorney up to January, 1899; that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tulare County v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Freeman v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Laguna Drainage District v. Charles Martin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Purcell v. Victor Power & Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Hardy v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920