Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Parsons

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1927No. 25685PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

Appellee Mrs. Edna Earl Parsons, hereinafter called “owner,” exhibited her bill against the defendant, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, hereinafter called “surety,” and J. W. McNeill, hereinafter called “contractor,” and certain materialmen, to-wit, the Vicksburg Lumber Company, Enterprise Plumbing & Metal "Works, the Sanitary Plumbing Company, Cambre Bros., Wright Bros. Hardware Company, Success Sand & Gravel Company, H. H. Ludke, and Jones Drug Company, the aggregate of whose claims in a certain building contract totals four thousand one hundred forty dollars and eighty-four…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Williams v. International Harvester Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. BEVIS CONSTR. CO., INC. v. KittrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ParsonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Natchez Inv. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API