Legal Opinion

Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1904No. 165PublishedCited by 49 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' SIXTH CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The mechanic’s lien law of Ohio of 1894 is unconstitutional because: (a) It denies to the owner of real estate the right of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and the- right of contract in relation thereto, of making and enforcing contracts, of fixing and limiting the consideration therefor, and' the manner and. time of payment, and is not for the…

Read the full summary

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' SIXTH CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The mechanic’s lien law of Ohio of 1894 is unconstitutional because: (a) It denies to the owner of real estate the right of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and the- right of contract in relation thereto, of making and enforcing contracts, of fixing and limiting the consideration therefor, and' the manner and. time of payment, and is not for the equal protection and' benefit of the. people, and therefore contravenes sections 1 and 2 of the Bill of Rights. (b) It…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

the court.

The Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company, a corporation of Ohio, made a contract with one McClain for the construction of a hotel building and opera- house at Columbus, Ohio.

McClain contracted with Jones & Laughlins, Limited, a partnership association organized under the laws of Pennsylvania, for a certain amount of steel to be used in the buildings which he undertook to erect.

Under that contract Jones & Laughlins, Limited, furnished steel of the value of 143,296.74.

Proceeding under certain statutes of Ohio relating to liens for mechanics and others, Jones & Laughlins, Limited,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Town of South Ottawa v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Van Stone v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Sim v. EdenbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API