Legal Opinion

Williams v. International Harvester Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1943PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit.

The action grows out of the sale by the defendants Amundson & Baur, partners, of a new International Pickup truck to the plaintiff. Amundson & Baur are alleged to have been agents of the defendant International Harvester Company. The latter defendant will be hereinafter referred to as International.

We are met at the outset with the contention of the defendants that the amended complaint, upon which the case was tried, does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and shall first consider that question.

In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hardwick v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lee Tung v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Jeffries v. PankowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ParsonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Goff v. EldeOregon Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Minnehoma Financial Co. v. PauliWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rogue Valley Memorial Hospital v. Salem Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Elwert v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API