Legal Opinion

Shadwrick v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 3, 1991No. 89-917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) filed an action against Catherine Shadwrick, seeking a judgment declaring that Shadwrick committed arson by burning her house and that it was therefore not obligated to pay Shadwrick any proceeds from her homeowner’s insurance policy. At the close of State Farm’s case, Shadwrick made a motion for a directed verdict based on the alleged insufficiency of State Farm’s evidence.

The jury returned a verdict for State Farm, and in its order entering judgment on the verdict the trial court stated that State Farm had “no obligation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Tucker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ritch v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. King Mines Resort, Inc. v. MALACHI M. & MINERALS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Guyoungtech USA, Inc. v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Richey v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API