Legal Opinion
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Ross
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 22, 1997No. 1960389Published
1Opinion of the Court
703 So.2d 324 (1997)
NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
v.
Bernette B. ROSS[1].
1960389.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
August 22, 1997.
Richard E. Smith and Rhonda Pitts Chambers of Rives & Peterson, Birmingham, for appellant.
Yvonne Green Davis, Birmingham, for appellee.
SEE, Justice.
This arbitration case arises out of Bernette Ross's purchase of an automobile, sold to her by Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. ("Jim Burke"), and financed by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation ("Nissan"). Ross sued Jim Burke and Nissan, alleging, among other things, fraud. Jim Burke and Nissan moved to stay the proceeding below…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Chatham Shipping Company, Warwick Corporation and Tsakalotos Navigation Corp., Libelants-Appellees v. Fertex Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Dominex, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.