Wilson v. Interlake Steel Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
Relying on a trespass theory, plaintiffs seek damages for noise that disturbs and annoys them while causing no physical injury to their property. Under the circumstances, we will deny them a trespass remedy, while preserving the possibility of a recovery on a nuisance theory, despite their unsuccessful prosecution of a similar action for injunctive relief in 1974. Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment in defendants’ favor and remand the case for a determination of the nuisance issue.
Plaintiffs are 22 retirees who own or reside in 14 homes adjacent to defendants’ steel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Exxon Corp. v. YaremaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.