Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Interlake Steel Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1982No. S.F. 24365PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

Relying on a trespass theory, plaintiffs seek damages for noise that disturbs and annoys them while causing no physical injury to their property. Under the circumstances, we will deny them a trespass remedy, while preserving the possibility of a recovery on a nuisance theory, despite their unsuccessful prosecution of a similar action for injunctive relief in 1974. Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment in defendants’ favor and remand the case for a determination of the nuisance issue.

Plaintiffs are 22 retirees who own or reside in 14 homes adjacent to defendants’ steel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Exxon Corp. v. YaremaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API