Legal Opinion

People v. Duarte

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1984No. F001928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, J.

—We affirm a judgment with a modification of sentence to prohibit the subsequent penal and administrative use of more than one of two convictions arising from a single act of driving after excessive drinking. We also find that a municipal court record which appeared to raise a question concerning the need for an interpreter was insufficiently challenged by defendant’s mere reference to a “silent record” and failure to present affirmatively some evidence that he was deprived of a needed interpreter.

After jury trial defendant was convicted of violations of Vehicle Code…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. ToureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. SubramaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. Tom, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API