People v. Sweet
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
207 Cal.App.3d 78 (1989)
254 Cal. Rptr. 567
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JAIME ALLEN SWEET et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Docket No. B037255.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.
January 11, 1989.
COUNSEL
James L. Crowder and S.R. Balash, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.
Thomas W. Sneddon, Jr., District Attorney, and Gerald McC. Franklin, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
STONE (S.J.), P.J.
May a statute which increases punishment on a new drunk driving conviction where the defendant has incurred prior convictions for that offense…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- People v. ForresterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Telly Savalas DensonKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. TreadwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.