Legal Opinion
Richardson v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE/ALLEGIS
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 6, 2007No. COA06-875PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge.
Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group ("defendant-employer") and its insurance carrier, Kemper Insurance Company/American Protection Insurance c/o Specialty Risk Services (collectively, "defendants"), appeal from an order of the Full Commission of the North Carolina Industrial Commission ("Full Commission") filed 15 March 2006 awarding workers' compensation benefits to Penny M. Rumple Richardson ("plaintiff"). For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
In 1996, plaintiff began working for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sachdev v. SachdevSuperior Court of Guam · 2018