Legal Opinion

People v. Hastings

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1985No. Docket 75030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In People v Kyllonen, 402 Mich 135; 262 NW2d 2 (1978), we held that the person who had stolen property could not be convicted of buying, receiving, or aiding in the concealment of that property under the then-effective language of MCL 750.535(1); MSA 28.803(1). The issue in the instant case is whether the 1979 amendment of that statute, 1 which added possessing and concealing stolen property to the list of proscribed conduct, changes the Kyllonen rule. The Court of Appeals concluded that it did not, and reversed the defendant’s conviction. We disagree, and reverse the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Eaton v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. People v. KyllonenMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sewell v. Clearing MacHine Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marrs v. Board of MedicineMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. MortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. Von EverettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. CorcoranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API