Sewell v. Clearing MacHine Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The issue before us today is whether, in an action in a circuit court seeking damages for personal injury, the circuit court has jurisdiction to decide whether the defendant is the plaintiff’s employer and thus able to invoke the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Dis*58ability Compensation Act. MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131). We hold that the circuit court has jurisdiction to make this determination.
I
On May 10, 1976, while an employee of Bathey Manufacturing Company, the plaintiff was seriously injured in an industrial accident. In 1978, he filed a complaint in the Wayne Circuit Court,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Szydlowski v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. LittkyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Boscaglia v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Reed v. YackellMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Jones v. Jay Truck Driver Training Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Integral Insurance v. Maersk Container Service Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Amerisure Insurance Companies v. Time Auto Transportation, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.