Legal Opinion
Marrs v. Board of Medicine
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1985No. Docket 73499PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
We are required in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in shortening substantially a one-year suspension im posed by the Michigan Board of Medicine on a physician found to have violated the Medical Practice Act and the so-called amphetamine rule.
I
On July 12, 1979, the Attorney General filed a formal complaint against Jack W. Marrs, M.D., charging the physician with violating the amphetamine rule, 1978 AACS, R 338.2302, in prescribing amphetamines to two patients, G.S. and S.S., and with violating the Medical Practice Act, MCL 338.1801 et seq.; MSA 14.542(1)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Department of Transportation v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Wayne County Prosecutor v. Parole BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Elia v. HazenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.