Legal Opinion
Alley's of Kingsport, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 27, 2012No. 11-100CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*451ORDER AND OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiffs are former owners of Chrysler automobile dealerships. They allege an uncompensated taking of their property rights from the Government’s application of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), 12 U.S.C. § 5211.1 According to plaintiffs, the takings occurred when the Government required Chrysler to terminate dealerships as a condition of obtaining financial assistance. The dealers’ property rights allegedly taken by the Government were franchise contracts, ongoing automobile businesses, and automobile dealer rights under state law.2
Defendant filed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Spitzer Motor City, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Alley's of Kingsport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ivaldy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.