Ivaldy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1)
ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRESTONE, Judge.
I. Introduction
Pro se plaintiff Phil Ivaldy alleges that he and other members of informal groups named the Loral Stockholder Protective Committee (“LSPC”) and American Shareholder Rights were shareholders of Loral Space and Communications Ltd. (“Loral”), which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2003 as part of an agreement to sell assets to another company. See PL’s Resp. 5. Mr. Ivaldy seeks damages of $2,000,000,000 based on actions of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duvall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Straw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017