Legal Opinion
Spitzer Motor City, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 9, 2015No. 10-647C, 11-100C, and 12-900CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; RCFC 12(b)(6); Allegations Sufficient to State a Fifth Amendment Taking; Allegations of Economic Loss
OPINION DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The above-captioned cases concern three groups of plaintiffs who are former owners of dealerships authorized to sell cars manufactured by General Motors Co. (“GM”) and Chrysler Group, LLC (“Chrysler”) (collectively, “the manufacturers”). 1 In February of 2009, as part of the Automotive Industry Financing Program (“AIFP”), the government agreed to give $30 billion in loans and equity…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colonial Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Colonial Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Colonial Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Colonial Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019