Legal Opinion

Dofasco Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 12, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-149; Court 07-00135PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STANCEU, Judge.

Dofasco Inc., Sorevco Inc., and Do Sol Galva Ltd. (“plaintiffs”) initiated this action under 19 U.S.C. § 1516a (2000) to contest a final determination (“Final Results”) issued by the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order on imports of certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from Canada (“subject merchandise”). Compl. ¶¶ 1-2; see Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Canada: Final Results of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ontario Forest Industries Assoc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. American Grape Growers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  4. Geum Poong Corp. v. United States.United States Court of International Trade · 2002
  5. Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  2. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  3. Arcelormittal Dofasco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  4. Legacy Classic Furniture, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  5. Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API