Legal Opinion
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 29, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-60; Court 12-00020PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Chief Judge:
Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Lumber Liquidators Services, LLC, and Home Legend, LLC (collectively “Armstrong”), 2 move for “party litigant re-designation,” from Defendant-Intervenor in (the now severed and dismissed) Court Number 11-00452 to Plaintiff-intervenor in (the now remaining) Court Number 12-00020. Armstrong’s Mot. at 2; see also supra note 1. The court construes this motion as a motion to intervene pursuant to USCIT Rule 24 in Court No. 12-00020, out of time, as Plaintiff-intervenor, and grants the motion, finding good cause for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McKenzie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Schnabel v. LuiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring, Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014