Legal Opinion
Styles v. F. R. Long Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 29, 1904PublishedCited by 25 opinions
On error to Passaic Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The facts of this case are stated in Styles v. Long Company, 38 Vroom 413. After the reversal of the judgment of the Passaic Circuit the ease was retried, and a verdict directed for the defendant in accordance, as was thought, with the views expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The judgment rendered on that verdict is now before us for review. The plaintiff contends that the defendant is liable because, by its contract with the county authorities, it agreed to provide and maintain the temporary bridge, and to assume all risks…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Van Winkle v. American Steam Boiler Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
- Jansen v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
3Cited by25 opinions
- Borough of Brooklawn v. Brooklawn Housing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.