Legal Opinion

Mourot v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing Opticians

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1985No. 84-241PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The Arkansas Board of Dispensing Opticians was created by Act 589 of 1981 (Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 72-2102 — 72-2123 [Supp. 1983]). Among the Board’s duties are the registration and licensure of dispensing opticians. Applicants for registration or licensure are normally required to successfully complete an examination of their professional skills. However, section nine of the Act (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 72-2109) is a “grandfather clause” which allows the registration or licensure, without examination, of dispensing opticians who meet certain requirements. Under section nine, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bishop v. LINKWAY STORES, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. City of Little Rock v. Arkansas Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Omega Tube & Conduit Corp. v. MaplesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Leathers v. WS Compton Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Tolhurst v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Omega Tube & Conduit Corp. v. MaplesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API