Legal Opinion
Texaco, Inc. v. Borda
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 17, 1967No. 16341PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*608OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Judge Augelli, the nominal respondent,1 by Order dated November 14, 1966, 'stayed all proceedings, including discovery, in a private anti-trust suit2 brought by the respondent Charles A. Borda against the petitioner Texaco, Inc. and the ten respondent oil companies, pending “determination” of a criminal action3 brought by the United States against - eight of Texaco’s co-defendants in Borda’s civil action. Texaco was named as a co-conspirator in the criminal action. The civil and criminal actions alike charged a conspiracy to restrain trade in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pet Milk Company v. Willis W. Ritter, Carnation Company v. Willis W. Ritter, Continental Baking Company v. Willis W. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Rapp v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Elsa W. De Wagenknecht v. Mrs. Hugo StinnesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
3Cited by58 opinions
- Lombard's, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. And Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. BergenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.