Inter-Tel Technologies, Inc. v. Linn Station Properties, LLC
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice ABRAMSON.
Piercing the corporate veil is an equitable doctrine invoked by courts to allow a creditor recourse against the shareholders of a corporation. In short, the limited liability which is the hallmark of a corporation is disregarded and the debt of the pierced entity becomes enforceable against those who have exercised dominion over the corporation to the point that it has no real separate existence. A successful veil-piercing claim requires both this element of domination and circumstances in which continued recognition of the corporation as a separate…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger DhimantecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. The Pepper Source, Caribe Crown, Inc., Gerald Marchese Doing Business as Jamar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Turner v. AndrewKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Schultz v. General Electric Healthcare Financial Services Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Pannell v. ShannonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Edward Gallagher v. Kathleen PershaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Inverultra, S.A. v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.