Legal Opinion

Farmers State Bank v. Scheel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. 17553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

— The defendant, Henry Scheel, is indebted to the respondent, the Farmers State Bank, in the amount of $880, upon a promissory note dated January 20, 1921. On March 19, 1921, defendant executed to respondent an assignment of lease covering *430certain lands he was then farming, containing the following provisions:

‘ ‘ This assignment is intended to secure the payment of the sum of Eight hundred Eighty Dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent per annum from date until maturity, after maturity, twelve per cent per annum, according to the terms of a certain promissory note dated Jan.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bellingham Bay Boom Co. v. BrisboisWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Heermans v. BlakesleeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Heermans v. BlakesleeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Woodward v. CrumpTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Barclay's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Gem State Lumber Co. v. Galion Irrigated Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lloyd L. Hughes, Inc. v. WiddersWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kerry v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. First National Bank v. Farm Loan & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API