Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Crump

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROM HAMBLEN. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamblen County. W. R. Hicks, Judge,.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This cause was heard in the Court below, upon an agreed statement of facts, and judgment was rendered for defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed to this Court, and assigned errors. The whole *370controversy arises out of the assignment of a written contract between Paulett & Lotspeich as lessors, and Fred Scruggs and Eliza J. Scruggs as lessees, by which the lessees were to pay the lessors one-half of all grain grown on a certain farm for the year 1893, and when the grain is gathered they are to . haul the lessors’ part to them at their own expense, etc. On June 1, 1893, while the crop was in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  2. Farmers State Bank v. ScheelWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. United States v. THIRD NAT. BK. OF NASHVILLE, TENN.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API