Heermans v. Blakeslee
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered March 13, 1916, dismissing an action for an accounting, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, Harry C. Heermans, seeks an accounting from the defendant, F. G. Blakeslee, for moneys received by him through writs of garnishment issued upon a judgment rendered in his favor against the Washington Public Service Company, and also seeks to have the defendant enjoined from causing to be issued additional writs of garnishment against the debtors of that company. The moneys so acquired and sought to be acquired by the defendant are claimed by the plaintiff as assignee of that company. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint upon the ground that it does not state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Blumauer v. ClockWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Lawrence v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Spokane Merchants' Ass'n v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heermans v. BlakesleeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- J. W. Fales Co. v. O. H. Seiple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Gem State Lumber Co. v. Galion Irrigated Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Farmers State Bank v. ScheelWashington Supreme Court · 1923